|
Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Full Text Issue Listing |
| Summary: | Update English dictionaries | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Internationalization | Reporter: | nemeth.lacko | ||||||
| Component: | code | Assignee: | stefan.baltzer | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | issues@l10n <issues> | ||||||
| Severity: | Trivial | ||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | issues, Mathias_Bauer | ||||||
| Version: | OOo 3.0 | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||
| Issue Type: | PATCH | Latest Confirmation in: | --- | ||||||
| Developer Difficulty: | --- | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
nemeth.lacko
2008-12-18 15:57:05 UTC
Created attachment 58924 [details]
Updated English dictionaries
*** Issue 72145 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** I take over, I'm currently at it anyway. I'm a bit confused: it seems that in Issue 19563 also dictionaries have been attached. Are these the same dictionaries as those attached here? And will they become integrated in CWS hunspell4thesaurus? Will OOo3.0 work correctly with the new dictionaries? Ah, and the same for the hyphenation dictionaries in issue 90028. MBA: I have made this issue for the new dictionaries, so here is the right dictionaries. OOo 3 works with these dictionaries. Only the long ordinal numbers, like "17th" doesn't recognized by the old Hunspell 1.1.12 in OOo 3.0. MBA: I haven't renamed the dictionaries, but it's better to rename them to simple en_US.*, en_CA.* etc. Created attachment 59629 [details]
Updated English dictionaries
I have attached a new version from the dictionaries. I have shortened the dictionary file names. I had to modify a little bit the hyphenation patterns, because the previous version did't fix one of the ugliest English hyphenation mistake of OpenOffice.org 3.0 (can='t). (This was an old hyphenation error, but only for British texts in the older OpenOffice.org versions.) I will attach a test extension very soon (also for CWS hunspell4thesaurus). Test extension: Issue 19563 en_US dictionary test: see Issue 19563 en_US hyphenation test: see Issue 90028 So now we have spelling and hyphenation for en-GB and en-US and spelling for en-CA, en-ZA and en-AU. I also have the en-US thesaurus. Currently we use the en-GB hyphenation for en-CA, en-ZA and en-AU and the en-US thesaurus for all these locales. This is the main reason for having one big "en" linguistic extension. I prefer not to rush things and as 3.1 code freeze is near I would like to stay with one "en" linguistic package for the time being, though it would be a little bit bigger because of the new en-CA dictionaries. fixed in CWS mba31issues01 The english linguistic extension now comprises: en-US dictionary, hyphenation and thesaurus en-GB dictionary, hyphenation; thesaurus from en-US en-CA dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US en-AU dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US en-ZA dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US please verify en-US dictionary, hyphenation and thesaurus
en-GB dictionary, hyphenation; thesaurus from en-US
en-CA dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US
en-AU dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US
en-ZA dictionary, hyphenation from en-GB, thesaurus from en-US
> please verify
It's OK. Thanks. Do I verify the CWS, too?
Stefan (sba) will verify and approve it. It's already on the way. Verified in CWS mba31issues01. This issue is closed automatically. It should be fixed in a version with is available for longer than half a year (OOo 3.1). If you think this issue isn't fixed in the current version (OOo 3.2) please reopen it. But then please pay attention about the field 'target milestone'. The closure was approved by the Release Status Meeting at 22nd of February 2010 and it is based on the issue handling guideline for fixed/verified issues : http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Handle_fixed_verified_issues |